linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] reboot: Backup orderly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160115110517.GE5783@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:05:17 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Keerthy <a0393675@...com>, nm@...com, grygorii.strashko@...com,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	josh@...htriplett.org, edubezval@...il.com, joel@....id.au,
	mpe@...erman.id.au, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, dyoung@...hat.com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] reboot: Backup orderly_poweroff

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:13:12AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> FYI, you are making an unnecessarily obtuse argument by insisting on the 
> architecture != platform triviality and you also injected an uncalled for 
> patronizing tone into this discussion by pretending that I don't know that 
> distinction. It's sad.

I was trying to be helpful, but your attitude seems to always one of
finding some way to turn a reasonable discussion into an ad hominem
attack.  You've just proven that you're totally impossible to work
with.

I won't make the mistake of replying to one of your messages again.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.