lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:22:52 -0300
From:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
To:	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
	Alexandru Stan <amstan@...omium.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, naobsd@...il.com,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>,
	mbrugger@...e.com, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, andy.yan@...k-chips.com,
	romain.perier@...il.com, jic23@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add basic support for orion-r68

Hello Heiko,

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
> Am Freitag, 15. Januar 2016, 10:28:44 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
>> This is not a complete review but I just wanted to comment on two
>> things that I noticed:
>
> same for me for now :-)
>
>
>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Matthias Brugger
>> <matthias.bgg@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> > +       };
>> > +
>> > +       vcc_18: vcc18-regulator {
>> > +               compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> > +               regulator-name = "vcc_18";
>> > +               regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
>> > +               regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
>> > +               regulator-always-on;
>> > +               regulator-boot-on;
>> > +               vin-supply = <&vcc_sys>;
>> > +       };
>> > +
>> > +       /* supplies both host and otg */
>> > +       vcc_host: vcc-host-regulator {
>> > +               compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> > +               gpio = <&gpio0 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> > +               pinctrl-names = "default";
>> > +               pinctrl-0 = <&host_vbus_drv>;
>> > +               regulator-name = "vcc_host";
>> > +               regulator-always-on;
>> > +               regulator-boot-on;
>> > +               vin-supply = <&vcc_sys>;
>> > +       };
>> > +
>> > +       vccio_sd: vcc-io-sd-regulator {
>> > +               regulator-name= "vccio_sd";
>> > +               gpio = <&gpio0 9 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> > +               regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> > +               regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> > +       };
>> > +
>> > +       vcc_sd: vcc-sd-regulator {
>> > +               compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> > +               regulator-name = "vcc_sd";
>> > +               gpio = <&gpio3 11 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> > +               regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> > +               regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> > +               regulator-always-on;
>> > +               regulator-boot-on;
>> > +               vin-supply = <&vcc_io>;
>> > +       };
>> > +
>> > +       vcc_io: vcc-io-regulator {
>> > +               compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> > +               regulator-name = "vcc_io";
>> > +               regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> > +               regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> > +               regulator-always-on;
>> > +               regulator-boot-on;
>> > +               vin-supply = <&vcc_sys>;
>> > +       };
>> > +
>> > +       vcc_lan: vcc-lan-regulator {
>> > +               compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> > +               regulator-name = "vcc_lan";
>> > +               regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> > +               regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> > +               regulator-always-on;
>> > +               regulator-boot-on;
>> > +               vin-supply = <&vcc_io>;
>> > +       };
>> > +
>> > +       vcc_sys: vcc-sys-regulator {
>> > +               compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> > +               regulator-name = "vcc_sys";
>> > +               regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> > +               regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> > +               regulator-always-on;
>> > +               regulator-boot-on;
>> > +       };
>> > +
>> > +       vccio_wl: vccio-wl-regulator {
>> > +               compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> > +               regulator-name = "vccio_wl";
>> > +               regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> > +               regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> > +               regulator-always-on;
>> > +               regulator-boot-on;
>> > +               vin-supply = <&vcc_io>;
>> > +       };
>> > +
>> > +       vdd_10: vdd-10-regulator {
>> > +               compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> > +               regulator-name = "vdd_10";
>> > +               regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
>> > +               regulator-max-microvolt = <1000000>;
>> > +               regulator-always-on;
>> > +               regulator-boot-on;
>> > +               vin-supply = <&vcc_sys>;
>> > +       };
>> > +};
>>
>> There is only one regulator that is not marked as always-on. This will
>> prevent the regulator subsystem to disable unused regulators. Do you
>> really need all of them to be always-on?
>
> I do believe the regulators should be more or less correct. Sadly there are
> no real schematics for that specific device available, but the reference
> design for rk3368-based tv-boxes uses a hirarchy of hard-wired individual
> regulators without any ability to control for most of them [aka always on].
>
> And due to the r68 not sporting any different real pmic, I'd believe the
> Orion will most likely also follow that scheme.
>

I see, thanks a lot for the clarification. But then in that case I
wonder what's the point of defining the gpio property in the fixed
regulator device nodes?

>
> Heiko

Best regards,
Javier

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ