lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <593bcd768227b953c0fc87cc0e5b175d@agner.ch>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:08:31 -0800
From:	Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	festevam@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: Lockdep warning when using REGCACHE_RBTREE

On 2016-01-15 08:28, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 05:14:47PM -0800, Stefan Agner wrote:
> 
>> On a slightly other topic, I question whether REGCACHE_RBTREE is the
>> right cache type for the DCU DRM driver. The driver has uses a regmap
>> area of 1144 32-bit registers, the most space is used by the layer
>> configuration registers which are 0x40 apart and 0x0-0x20 for each layer
>> are actually used (hence somewhat above 50%).
> 
>> Would FLAT be the better cache type?
> 
> Yes, and if it's a MMIO device the performance of a flat cache is more
> in line with the device performance.

Thanks for confirming that. I will switch to REGCACHE_FLAT then, I found
a second driver with the very same issue, also a MMIO mapped device:
drivers/pwm/pwm-fsl-ftm.c...

--
Stefan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ