lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 17:50:33 -0600 From: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@....com> To: <tony.luck@...el.com>, <bp@...en8.de>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <hpa@...or.com> CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH V2 2/5] x86/mcheck/AMD: Do not perform shared bank check for future processors Fam17h and above should not require a check to see if a bank is shared or not. For shared banks, there will always be only one core that has visibility over the MSRs and only that particular core will be allowed to write to the MSRs Fixing the code to return early if we detect Fam17h or above. No change in functionality for earlier processors Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@....com> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c index e99b150..da570a8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c @@ -84,6 +84,14 @@ struct thresh_restart { static inline bool is_shared_bank(int bank) { + /* + * For Fam17h and above, we shouldn't require this check. + * Only the core that can see valid values on the MSRs has + * control over the respective MCA bank + */ + if (mce_flags.smca) + return 0; + /* Bank 4 is for northbridge reporting and is thus shared */ return (bank == 4); } -- 2.7.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists