[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1453269803.14751.10.camel@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:03:23 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] ftrace with regs + live patching for ppc64 LE
(ABI v2)
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 15:17 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Fri 2015-12-04 15:45:29, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > Changes since v4:
> > * change comment style in entry_64.S to C89
> > (nobody is using assembler syntax comments there).
> > * the bool function restore_r2 shouldn't return 2,
> > that's a little confusing.
> > * Test whether the compiler supports -mprofile-kernel
> > and only then define CC_USING_MPROFILE_KERNEL
> > * also make the return value of klp_check_compiler_support
> > depend on that.
>
> Note that there is still needed the extra patch from
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2093867/focus=2099603
> to get the livepatching working.
Sorry which extra patch?
> Both ftrace with regs and live patching works for me with this patch
> set and the extra patch. So. for the whole patchset:
>
> Tested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Can you give me some more info on how you're testing it? What config options,
toolchain etc.?
For me the series doesn't even boot, even with livepatching disabled.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists