[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160120094830.GA3178@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 10:48:30 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] ftrace with regs + live patching for ppc64 LE
(ABI v2)
On Wed 2016-01-20 17:03:23, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 15:17 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Fri 2015-12-04 15:45:29, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > > Changes since v4:
> > > * change comment style in entry_64.S to C89
> > > (nobody is using assembler syntax comments there).
> > > * the bool function restore_r2 shouldn't return 2,
> > > that's a little confusing.
> > > * Test whether the compiler supports -mprofile-kernel
> > > and only then define CC_USING_MPROFILE_KERNEL
> > > * also make the return value of klp_check_compiler_support
> > > depend on that.
> >
> > Note that there is still needed the extra patch from
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2093867/focus=2099603
> > to get the livepatching working.
>
> Sorry which extra patch?
It was in an older reply and can be found at
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2093867/focus=2099603
> > Both ftrace with regs and live patching works for me with this patch
> > set and the extra patch. So. for the whole patchset:
> >
> > Tested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
>
> Can you give me some more info on how you're testing it? What config options,
> toolchain etc.?
You need to fulfill all dependencies for CONFIG_LIVEPATCH, see
kernel/livepatch/Kconfig. Please, find attached the config that
that I used.
I did the testing on PPC64LE with a kernel based on 4.4.0-rc8
using the attached config. I used the following stuff:
$> gcc --version
gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.8.5
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
$> rpm -q binutils
binutils-2.25.0-13.1.ppc64le
I tested it the following way:
# booted the compiled kernel and printed the default cmdline
$> cat /proc/cmdline
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-rc3-11-default+ root=UUID=...
# tried function_graph tracer to check ftrace with regs
echo function_graph >/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer ; \
echo 1 >/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/tracing_on ; \
sleep 1 ; \
/usr/bin/ls /proc ; \
echo 0 >/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/tracing_on ; \
less /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
# loaded the patch and printed the patch cmdline
$> modprobe livepatch-sample
$> cat /proc/cmdline
this has been live patched
# tried to disable and enable the patch
$> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/livepatch/livepatch_sample/enabled
$> cat /proc/cmdline
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-rc3-11-default+ root=UUID=...
$> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/livepatch/livepatch_sample/enabled
$> cat /proc/cmdline
this has been live patched
# also checked messages
$> dmesg | tail -n 4
[ 33.673057] livepatch: tainting kernel with TAINT_LIVEPATCH
[ 33.673068] livepatch: enabling patch 'livepatch_sample'
[ 1997.098257] livepatch: disabling patch 'livepatch_sample'
[ 2079.696277] livepatch: enabling patch 'livepatch_sample'
> For me the series doesn't even boot, even with livepatching disabled.
I wonder if you have enabled CONFIG_FTRACE_STARTUP_TEST and if
the ftrace with regs fails on your setup.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists