[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu8bT286EZHj6b+P1eZDBCGB=qfw3QD5POG4gqg2FE=-6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 11:18:44 +0100
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
mpe@...erman.id.au, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] s390: enable text relative kallsyms for 64-bit targets
On 20 January 2016 at 11:17, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:04:24AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 20 January 2016 at 10:43, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:05:37AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> >> This enables the newly introduced text-relative kallsyms support when
>> >> building 64-bit targets. This cuts the size of the kallsyms address
>> >> table in half, reducing the memory footprint of the kernel .rodata
>> >> section by about 250 KB for a defconfig build.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
>> >> ---
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
>> >> index dbeeb3a049f2..588160fd1db0 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
>> >> +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
>> >> @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ config S390
>> >> select HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
>> >> select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
>> >> select HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
>> >> + select KALLSYMS_TEXT_RELATIVE if 64BIT
>> >
>> > Please remove the "if 64BIT" since s390 is always 64BIT in the meantime.
>> > Tested on s390 and everything seems still to work ;)
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
>> >
>>
>> Thanks! Did you take a look at /proc/kallsyms, by any chance? It
>> should look identical with and without these patches
>
> Close to identical, since the generated code and offsets change a bit with
> your new config option enabled and disabled. But only those parts that are
> linked behind kernel/kallsyms.c.
>
> However I did run a couple of ftrace, kprobes tests and enforced call
> backtraces. Everything still works.
>
> So it looks all good.
>
Thanks a lot!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists