lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160120133401.GA3487@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2016 21:34:03 +0800
From:	Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@....com>
To:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
CC:	<will.deacon@....com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<nd@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: add a shortcut when the @dev_node is NULL

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 01:02:25PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:15:05AM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> > This patch adds a shortcut for the code when the @device_node is NULL.
> > In my juno-r1 board, the boot time can be faster by 0.004014s.
> 
> How have you made sure this number is reliable and not just noise in the
> boot process?
In the boot process, there are 5 or more modules whose @dev_node are
NULL. Without the patch, the kernel will waste some cycles to do the
meaningless calculations for all these modules. In theory, it is not noise.
If you have interest, I can send you the kernel boot logs. :)

Of course, the 0.004014s maybe not accurate enough, it is just an
approximate number.

Thanks
Huang Shijie

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ