[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <569FB471.8000909@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:23:13 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
Cc: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt
controller
On 20/01/16 16:10, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com> writes:
>
>>> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &ctl))
>>> + panic("%s: failed to get reg base", node->name);
>>> +
>>> + chip = kzalloc(sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + chip->ctl = ctl;
>>> + chip->base = base;
>
> As I said before, this assumes the outer DT node uses a ranges
> property. Normally reg properties work the same whether they specify an
> offset within an outer "ranges" or have a full address directly. It
> would be easy enough to make this work with either, so I don't see any
> reason not to.
Yup, that is a good point. I guess Marc can address this in the next
round, since we need a DT binding anyway.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists