[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vc__QXa=HE1Zw5yJut_sVEUs88tYTdeNxFnOVvBmB24rw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 21:38:28 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Julian Margetson <runaway@...dw.ms>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: use "dmas" DT property to find
dma channel
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com> wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> writes:
>
>> On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 18:50 +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> writes:
>>>
>>> > > Tested on AVR32 (DMA driver) and Sigma SMP8642 (SATA driver).
>>> > >
>>> > > Code here:
>>> > > https://bitbucket.org/mansr/linux-dwc/branch/dwc-sata
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for testing!
>>>
>>> Have you had time to look any more at these patches?
>>
>> Not yet.
>> I will look soon for sure.
>>
>> One comment still regarding to lli types. We can avoid warnings by
>> using (__force u32) in macros.
>
> But that won't give the benefits of having the types checked.
You mean if we access the lli->field directly? I didn't quite get what
use case you are keeping in mind.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists