[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A07D97.6030606@daenzer.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:41:27 +0900
From: Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>
To: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@...il.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, mgraesslin@....org, kwin@....org,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-4.4 bisected: kwin5 stuck on kde5 loading screen with
radeon
On 21.01.2016 15:38, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 21.01.2016 14:31, Mario Kleiner wrote:
>> On 01/21/2016 04:43 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 21.01.2016 05:32, Mario Kleiner wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So the problem is that AMDs hardware frame counters reset to
>>>> zero during a modeset. The old DRM code dealt with drivers doing that by
>>>> keeping vblank irqs enabled during modesets and incrementing vblank
>>>> count by one during each vblank irq, i think that's what
>>>> drm_vblank_pre_modeset() and drm_vblank_post_modeset() were meant for.
>>>
>>> Right, looks like there's been a regression breaking this. I suspect the
>>> problem is that vblank->last isn't getting updated from
>>> drm_vblank_post_modeset. Not sure which change broke that though, or how
>>> to fix it. Ville?
>>>
>>
>> The whole logic has changed and the software counter updates are now
>> driven all the time by the hw counter.
>>
>>>
>>> BTW, I'm seeing a similar issue with drm_vblank_on/off as well, which
>>> exposed the bug fixed by 209e4dbc ("drm/vblank: Use u32 consistently for
>>> vblank counters"). I've been meaning to track that down since then; one
>>> of these days hopefully, but if anybody has any ideas offhand...
>>
>> I spent the last few hours reading through the drm and radeon code and i
>> think what should probably work is to replace the
>> drm_vblank_pre/post_modeset calls in radeon/amdgpu by drm_vblank_off/on
>> calls. These are apparently meant for drivers whose hw counters reset
>> during modeset, [...]
>
> ... just like drm_vblank_pre/post_modeset. That those were broken is a
> regression which needs to be fixed anyway. I don't think switching to
> drm_vblank_on/off is suitable for stable trees.
Even more so since as I mentioned, there is (has been since at least
about half a year ago) a counter jumping bug with drm_vblank_on/off as well.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists