| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu83G81SW5hd+9oD=C=n01ROCr5iu7Nya1fijYHuV+YJWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:16:20 +0100
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@...escale.com>,
Sharma Bhupesh <bhupesh.sharma@...escale.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 19/21] efi: stub: add implementation of efi_random_alloc()
On 21 January 2016 at 17:10, Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jan, at 02:19:13PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> This implements efi_random_alloc(), which allocates a chunk of memory of
>> a certain size at a certain alignment, and uses the random_seed argument
>> it receives to randomize the offset of the allocation.
>
> s/offset/address/ ?
>
> I see what you're getting at with the word "offset" but ultimately,
> this is a memory allocation function, and it returns an address.
>
> "offset" implies to me that the implementation allocates a larger
> memory chunk than is required and returns an address that is >= the
> start of the bigger-than-required-allocation.
>
Well, offset is horribly overloaded in our world, so let's stick with 'address'
>> This is implemented by iterating over the UEFI memory map, counting the
>> number of suitable slots (aligned offsets) within each region, and picking
>> a random number between 0 and 'number of slots - 1' to select the slot,
>> This should guarantee that each possible offset is chosen equally likely.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h | 4 +
>> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/random.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h
>> index 206b7252b9d1..7a38e29da53d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h
>> @@ -46,4 +46,8 @@ void efi_get_virtmap(efi_memory_desc_t *memory_map, unsigned long map_size,
>> efi_status_t efi_get_random_bytes(efi_system_table_t *sys_table,
>> unsigned long size, u8 *out);
>>
>> +efi_status_t efi_random_alloc(efi_system_table_t *sys_table_arg,
>> + unsigned long size, unsigned long align_bits,
>> + unsigned long *addr, unsigned long random_seed);
>> +
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/random.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/random.c
>> index f539b1e31459..d4829824508c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/random.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/random.c
>> @@ -33,3 +33,88 @@ efi_status_t efi_get_random_bytes(efi_system_table_t *sys_table,
>>
>> return rng->get_rng(rng, NULL, size, out);
>> }
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Return a weight for a memory entry depending on how many offsets it covers
>> + * that are suitably aligned and supply enough room for the allocation.
>> + */
>> +static unsigned long get_entry_weight(efi_memory_desc_t *md, unsigned long size,
>> + unsigned long align_bits)
>> +{
>> + u64 start, end;
>> +
>> + if (md->type != EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WB))
>> + return 0;
>
> This could do with a comment. When would EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY not
> have this attribute capability in the memory map?
>
Actually, I think I should drop it instead. The other alloc functions
only check for EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY, and this is intended to be
generic code. Also, I have never seen a system with
EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY with the WB bit cleared.
>> +
>> + start = round_up(md->phys_addr, 1 << align_bits);
>> + end = round_down(md->phys_addr + md->num_pages * EFI_PAGE_SIZE - size,
>> + 1 << align_bits);
>> +
>> + if (start >= end)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + return (end - start) >> align_bits;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * The UEFI memory descriptors have a virtual address field that is only used
>> + * when installing the virtual mapping using SetVirtualAddressMap(). Since it
>> + * is unused here, we can reuse it to keep track of each descriptor's weight.
>> + */
>> +#define MD_WEIGHT(md) ((md)->virt_addr)
>> +
>> +efi_status_t efi_random_alloc(efi_system_table_t *sys_table_arg,
>> + unsigned long size, unsigned long align_bits,
>> + unsigned long *addr, unsigned long random_seed)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long map_size, desc_size, max_weight = 0, target;
>> + efi_memory_desc_t *memory_map;
>> + efi_status_t status = EFI_NOT_FOUND;
>> + int l;
>
> Could you pick a more descriptive variable name?
>
Sure :-)
>> +
>> + status = efi_get_memory_map(sys_table_arg, &memory_map, &map_size,
>> + &desc_size, NULL, NULL);
>> + if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
>> + return status;
>> +
>> + /* assign each entry in the memory map a weight */
>> + for (l = 0; l < map_size; l += desc_size) {
>> + efi_memory_desc_t *md = (void *)memory_map + l;
>> + unsigned long weight;
>> +
>> + weight = get_entry_weight(md, size, align_bits);
>> + MD_WEIGHT(md) = weight;
>> + max_weight += weight;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* find a random number between 0 and max_weight */
>> + target = (max_weight * (u16)random_seed) >> 16;
>> +
>> + /* find the entry whose accumulated weight covers the target */
>> + for (l = 0; l < map_size; l += desc_size) {
>> + efi_memory_desc_t *md = (void *)memory_map + l;
>> +
>> + if (target < MD_WEIGHT(md)) {
>> + unsigned long pages;
>> +
>> + *addr = round_up(md->phys_addr, 1 << align_bits) +
>> + (target << align_bits);
>> + pages = round_up(size, EFI_PAGE_SIZE) / EFI_PAGE_SIZE;
>> +
>> + status = efi_call_early(allocate_pages,
>> + EFI_ALLOCATE_ADDRESS,
>> + EFI_LOADER_DATA,
>> + pages,
>> + (efi_physical_addr_t *)addr);
>
> You're mixing data types here. efi_physical_addr_t is always 64-bits,
> but 'addr' is unsigned long, which is 32-bits on 32-bit platforms.
> This cast isn't safe.
>
OK, I will fix that.
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + target -= MD_WEIGHT(md);
>
> I think this needs a comment.
Sure. Note that in my local version, I already replaced max_weight
with total_weight since it wasn't entirely accurate. So I'll try to
pick a better name for target as well.
Thanks,
Ard.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists