[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdV494HTr-ZDx+J0SkNdD+QRpdjpZbPvNwNcVGrdbNeA_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 19:28:22 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v4.5
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:00:21PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>> > Please pull the latest core-rcu-for-linus git tree from:
>>
>> > One thing I should note is that these pieces of documentation are fairly large
>> > files:
>> >
>> > .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html | 2897 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> > .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.htmlx | 2741 ++++++++++++++++++
>> >
>> > and are written in HTML, not the usual .txt style. I hope they are fine.
>>
>> Not to mention the PNG image:
>>
>> > .../RCU/Design/Requirements/2013-08-is-it-dead.png | Bin 0 -> 100825 bytes
>
> Most diagrams will be .svg. But if the .png is too objectionable, it
> would not be too big a deal to remove it.
>
> Thoughts?
Too late, it's in git history...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists