linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v4.5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160121192043.GA3818@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:20:43 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v4.5

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 07:28:22PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:00:21PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >> > Please pull the latest core-rcu-for-linus git tree from:
> >>
> >> > One thing I should note is that these pieces of documentation are fairly large
> >> > files:
> >> >
> >> >  .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html      | 2897 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >  .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.htmlx     | 2741 ++++++++++++++++++
> >> >
> >> > and are written in HTML, not the usual .txt style. I hope they are fine.
> >>
> >> Not to mention the PNG image:
> >>
> >> >  .../RCU/Design/Requirements/2013-08-is-it-dead.png |  Bin 0 -> 100825 bytes
> >
> > Most diagrams will be .svg.  But if the .png is too objectionable, it
> > would not be too big a deal to remove it.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> 
> Too late, it's in git history...

There is always "git rm".  Or is your concern instead the size of the
.git/objects directory?

							Thanx, Paul