linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v4.5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Jan 2016 21:04:24 +0100
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v4.5

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 07:28:22PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Paul E. McKenney
>> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:00:21PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>> >> > Please pull the latest core-rcu-for-linus git tree from:
>> >>
>> >> > One thing I should note is that these pieces of documentation are fairly large
>> >> > files:
>> >> >
>> >> >  .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html      | 2897 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> >  .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.htmlx     | 2741 ++++++++++++++++++
>> >> >
>> >> > and are written in HTML, not the usual .txt style. I hope they are fine.
>> >>
>> >> Not to mention the PNG image:
>> >>
>> >> >  .../RCU/Design/Requirements/2013-08-is-it-dead.png |  Bin 0 -> 100825 bytes
>> >
>> > Most diagrams will be .svg.  But if the .png is too objectionable, it
>> > would not be too big a deal to remove it.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>>
>> Too late, it's in git history...
>
> There is always "git rm".  Or is your concern instead the size of the
> .git/objects directory?

My only remark is that if we don't want PNGs, they shouldn't enter git history,
as "git rm" doesn't really remove them. So we can't get rid of the existing
ones, but we can still think about if we want (no) more of them...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds