lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:24:14 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v4.5

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 09:04:24PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 07:28:22PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> >> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:00:21PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >> >> > Please pull the latest core-rcu-for-linus git tree from:
> >> >>
> >> >> > One thing I should note is that these pieces of documentation are fairly large
> >> >> > files:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >  .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html      | 2897 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >> >  .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.htmlx     | 2741 ++++++++++++++++++
> >> >> >
> >> >> > and are written in HTML, not the usual .txt style. I hope they are fine.
> >> >>
> >> >> Not to mention the PNG image:
> >> >>
> >> >> >  .../RCU/Design/Requirements/2013-08-is-it-dead.png |  Bin 0 -> 100825 bytes
> >> >
> >> > Most diagrams will be .svg.  But if the .png is too objectionable, it
> >> > would not be too big a deal to remove it.
> >> >
> >> > Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Too late, it's in git history...
> >
> > There is always "git rm".  Or is your concern instead the size of the
> > .git/objects directory?
> 
> My only remark is that if we don't want PNGs, they shouldn't enter git history,
> as "git rm" doesn't really remove them. So we can't get rid of the existing
> ones, but we can still think about if we want (no) more of them...

Fair enough!  For whatever it is worth, we do have a number of .pbm,
.ppm, and .pdf files.

								Thanx, Paul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ