[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrWUk=Av3PAAC3cB5mNxGvqCeqbByTRqKju7swDf1HVJzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:04:02 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/cpufeature: Remove static_cpu_has()
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>
> Well, this one doesn't work properly before alternatives have run. And
> it was supposed to provide an optimized JMP because the assumption was
> that the offset it is jumping to is within a signed byte and thus a
> two-byte JMP.
>
Looks good except for the subject line -- you didn't actually remove
static_cpu_has :)
--Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists