linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86/cpufeature: Carve out X86_FEATURE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160121190340.GG21930@pd.tnic>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jan 2016 20:03:40 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86/cpufeature: Carve out X86_FEATURE_*

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:57:06AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 01/21/16 10:34, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > +#ifndef _ASM_X86_REQUIRED_FEATURES_H
>
> Why do we have all these include guards at the point of the #include?
> This is not standard procedure.

Some uapi monkey business:

abbf1590de22 ("UAPI: Partition the header include path sets and add uapi/ header directories")

The funny thing is, the headers themselves have the guards too. I'll try
to remove them to see what breaks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.