[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A166E7.3070601@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:16:55 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Harald Hoyer <harald@...hat.com>, Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix for ADJ_SETOFFSET w/ ADJ_NANO
On 01/21/2016 04:03 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> David Herrmann mailed me pointing out that one of the
> changes that landed in 4.5-rc broke users of ADJ_SETOFFSET
> when used with ADJ_NANO.
>
> I've implemented a fix to this issue and also introduced
> more unit tests to validate these going forward.
>
> Thomas: Can you queue the first patch for tip/timers/urgent?
>
> Shuah: The kselftests patch can wait to the next merge window
> if you'd prefer.
Yeah. Probably it has to wait until the next merge window as
this is a new test. I can pull this into linux-kselftest next
after merge window closes.
thanks,
-- Shuah
--
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@....samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
Powered by blists - more mailing lists