[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A1EF55.5000909@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:59:01 +0800
From: Zhong Kaihua <zhongkaihua@...wei.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
CC: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <will.deacon@....com>,
<xuyiping@...ilicon.com>, <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
<bintian.wang@...wei.com>, <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <puck.chen@...ilicon.com>,
<w.f@...wei.com>, <dan.zhao@...ilicon.com>,
<kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] arm64: dts: Add Hi6220 gpio configuration nodes
On 2016/1/19 21:37, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 19/01/16 10:51, Zhong Kaihua wrote:
>> arm64: dts: Add Hi6220 gpio configuration nodes
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhong Kaihua <zhongkaihua@...wei.com>
>> Kong Xinwei <kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-hi6220.txt | 23 +
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi | 259 +++++++++
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hikey-gpio.dtsi | 607 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 890 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-hi6220.txt
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hikey-gpio.dtsi
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-hi6220.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-hi6220.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..a9cbf21
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-hi6220.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
>> +Hisilicon Hi6220 GPIO controller bindings
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> + - compatible: "arm,pl061","arm,primecell"
>> + - gpio-controller: Marks the device node as a GPIO controller.
>> + - #gpio-cells: Should be 2. See gpio.txt in this directory for a
>> + description of the cells format.
>> + - interrupt-controller: Mark the device node as an interrupt controller
>> +
>
> Why do you need extra binding document here as the compatible is same as
> [1] ? You can extend that if required and add example there IMO.
>
Ok, I will remove the binding document in the next version. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists