linux-kernel - RE: mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: add support for ls1021a

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AM2PR04MB072287A0E9C83F507FDF282389C40@AM2PR04MB0722.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:01:26 +0000
From:	Yao Yuan <yao.yuan@....com>
To:	Han Xu <xhnjupt@...il.com>, Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@...escale.com>
CC:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	"han.xu@...escale.com" <han.xu@...escale.com>,
	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: add support for ls1021a

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Han Xu < xhnjupt@...il.com > wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@...escale.com> wrote:
> > This patch set is used for add the fsl-quadspi support for ls1021a and
> > ls1043a, so remove the patch:
> > mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: extend support for some special requerment.
> 
> Please use --cover-letter to generate cover letter.
> 
> >
> > This patch will be send with anther patch set for add QSPI support on LS2080A.
> >
> > All the new property are document in anther patch set which is already
> > send to linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org and devicetree@...r.kernel.org.
> > Here is the patch name:
> > 0001-Documentation-fsl-quadspi-Add-fsl-ls2080a-dspi-compa.patch
> > 0002-Documentation-fsl-quadspi-Add-fsl-ls2080a-qspi-compa.patch
> > 0003-dts-ls2080a-update-the-DTS-for-QSPI-and-DSPI-support.patch
> > 0004-Documentation-fsl-quadspi-Add-optional-properties.patch
> >
> > Any extra information you can find them on the patchwork:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078931/
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078951/
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8079091/
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078941/
> 
> Please send all patches in one patch set, this is not acceptable.
> 

Thanks for your review.
But those patches are dts binding patch. And will send to  devicetree@...r.kernel.org and some corresponding maintainer.

Those two patch sets will send to different mail-list and maintainers separately.

So, maybe it's better to send the patch to the maintainer accordingly and thus I think can also reduce the workload of maintainer.

How about your think?

Thanks.

Yuan Yao.