[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160122211644.GC2470@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:16:44 -0200
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>, acme@...nel.org
Subject: Re: net: use-after-free in recvmmsg
Em Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 09:39:53PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov escreveu:
> While running syzkaller fuzzer I've hit the following use-after-free:
<SNIP>
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8175ea0e>] __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x3e/0x40
> mm/kasan/report.c:295
> [<ffffffff851cc31a>] __sys_recvmmsg+0x6fa/0x7f0 net/socket.c:2261
> [< inline >] SYSC_recvmmsg net/socket.c:2281
> [<ffffffff851cc57f>] SyS_recvmmsg+0x16f/0x180 net/socket.c:2270
> [<ffffffff86332bb6>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a
> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:185
> ==================================================================
>
> I cannot reproduce it, but looking at __sys_recvmmsg code, it seems
> that sock is not necessary live after fput_light:
>
> out_put:
> fput_light(sock->file, fput_needed);
>
> if (err == 0)
> return datagrams;
>
> if (datagrams != 0) {
> /*
> * We may return less entries than requested (vlen) if the
> * sock is non block and there aren't enough datagrams...
> */
> if (err != -EAGAIN) {
> /*
> * ... or if recvmsg returns an error after we
> * received some datagrams, where we record the
> * error to return on the next call or if the
> * app asks about it using getsockopt(SO_ERROR).
> */
> sock->sk->sk_err = -err;
> }
>
> return datagrams;
> }
>
> return err;
> }
>
> I am on commit 30f05309bde49295e02e45c7e615f73aa4e0ccc2 (Jan 20).
> Seems to be added in commit a2e2725541fad72416326798c2d7fa4dafb7d337
> (Oct 2009).
Maybe this helps? Compile testing now...
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index 91c2de6f5020..03e57ad7ec9f 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -2240,31 +2240,31 @@ int __sys_recvmmsg(int fd, struct mmsghdr __user *mmsg, unsigned int vlen,
cond_resched();
}
-out_put:
- fput_light(sock->file, fput_needed);
-
if (err == 0)
- return datagrams;
+ goto out_put;
- if (datagrams != 0) {
+ if (datagrams == 0) {
+ datagrams = err;
+ goto out_put;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We may return less entries than requested (vlen) if the
+ * sock is non block and there aren't enough datagrams...
+ */
+ if (err != -EAGAIN) {
/*
- * We may return less entries than requested (vlen) if the
- * sock is non block and there aren't enough datagrams...
+ * ... or if recvmsg returns an error after we
+ * received some datagrams, where we record the
+ * error to return on the next call or if the
+ * app asks about it using getsockopt(SO_ERROR).
*/
- if (err != -EAGAIN) {
- /*
- * ... or if recvmsg returns an error after we
- * received some datagrams, where we record the
- * error to return on the next call or if the
- * app asks about it using getsockopt(SO_ERROR).
- */
- sock->sk->sk_err = -err;
- }
-
- return datagrams;
+ sock->sk->sk_err = -err;
}
+out_put:
+ fput_light(sock->file, fput_needed);
- return err;
+ return datagrams;
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE5(recvmmsg, int, fd, struct mmsghdr __user *, mmsg,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists