linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: mm: mark section-aligned portion of rodata NX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLDK8eVO2kUD1cB3TArL8k8pF=igc3O04Fa40QgQ2pwNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2016 13:19:03 -0800
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
	Victor Kamensky <victor.kamensky@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: mm: mark section-aligned portion of rodata NX

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Ard Biesheuvel
> <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On 7 December 2015 at 23:35, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>>> When rodata is large enough that it crosses a section boundary after the
>>> kernel text, mark the rest NX. This is as close to full NX of rodata as
>>> we can get without splitting page tables or doing section alignment via
>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_ALIGN_RODATA.
>>>
>>> When the config is:
>>>
>>>  CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA=y
>>>  # CONFIG_DEBUG_ALIGN_RODATA is not set
>>>
>>> Before:
>>>
>>> ---[ Kernel Mapping ]---
>>> 0x80000000-0x80100000           1M     RW NX SHD
>>> 0x80100000-0x80a00000           9M     ro x  SHD
>>> 0x80a00000-0xa0000000         502M     RW NX SHD
>>>
>>> After:
>>>
>>> ---[ Kernel Mapping ]---
>>> 0x80000000-0x80100000           1M     RW NX SHD
>>> 0x80100000-0x80700000           6M     ro x  SHD
>>> 0x80700000-0x80a00000           3M     ro NX SHD
>>> 0x80a00000-0xa0000000         502M     RW NX SHD
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>>> ---
>>> v2:
>>> - static declaration, ard
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 9 +++++++--
>>>  arch/arm/mm/init.c            | 7 ++++---
>>>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
>>> index a6e395c53a48..9c249c71fda1 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
>>> @@ -8,9 +8,7 @@
>>>  #include <asm/thread_info.h>
>>>  #include <asm/memory.h>
>>>  #include <asm/page.h>
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA
>>>  #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>>> -#endif
>>>
>>>  #define PROC_INFO                                                      \
>>>         . = ALIGN(4);                                                   \
>>> @@ -337,6 +335,13 @@ SECTIONS
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  /*
>>> + * Without CONFIG_DEBUG_ALIGN_RODATA, __start_rodata_section_aligned will
>>> + * be the first section-aligned location after __start_rodata. Otherwise,
>>> + * it will be equal to __start_rodata.
>>> + */
>>> +__start_rodata_section_aligned = ALIGN(__start_rodata, 1 << SECTION_SHIFT);
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>>   * These must never be empty
>>>   * If you have to comment these two assert statements out, your
>>>   * binutils is too old (for other reasons as well)
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
>>> index 321d3683dc7c..6b16f6cf4843 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
>>> @@ -579,6 +579,9 @@ struct section_perm {
>>>         pmdval_t clear;
>>>  };
>>>
>>> +/* First section-aligned location at or after __start_rodata. */
>>> +extern char __start_rodata_section_aligned[];
>>> +
>>>  static struct section_perm nx_perms[] = {
>>>         /* Make pages tables, etc before _stext RW (set NX). */
>>>         {
>>> @@ -596,16 +599,14 @@ static struct section_perm nx_perms[] = {
>>>                 .mask   = ~PMD_SECT_XN,
>>>                 .prot   = PMD_SECT_XN,
>>>         },
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ALIGN_RODATA
>>>         /* Make rodata NX (set RO in ro_perms below). */
>>>         {
>>>                 .name   = "rodata NX",
>>> -               .start  = (unsigned long)__start_rodata,
>>> +               .start  = (unsigned long)__start_rodata_section_aligned,
>>>                 .end    = (unsigned long)__init_begin,
>>
>> What happens if start > end ?
>
> It isn't possible, since rodata will be after text and before
> init_begin, so it must either less than or equal to init_begin. The
> equal case is quite possible, and that's fine, since both cases are
> (correctly) silently ignored by set_section_perms:
>
>                 for (addr = perms[i].start; addr < perms[i].end; addr
> += SECTION_SIZE)
>                     section_update(....
>
> -Kees

Hi Ard,

Is this v2 ok? I'd like to have your Ack before sending it to the patch tracker.

Thanks!

-Kees

>
>>
>>>                 .mask   = ~PMD_SECT_XN,
>>>                 .prot   = PMD_SECT_XN,
>>>         },
>>> -#endif
>>>  };
>>>
>>>  static struct section_perm ro_perms[] = {
>>> --
>>> 1.9.1
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kees Cook
>>> Chrome OS & Brillo Security
>
>
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Chrome OS & Brillo Security



-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security