[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160123161958.GA30110@krava.local>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 17:19:58 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] perf, tools, stat: Move noise/running printing into
printout
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 04:43:05AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > - if (run == 0 || ena == 0) {
> > > - fprintf(output, "CPU%*d%s%*s%s",
> > > - csv_output ? 0 : -4,
> > > - perf_evsel__cpus(counter)->map[cpu], csv_sep,
> > > - csv_output ? 0 : 18,
> > > - counter->supported ? CNTR_NOT_COUNTED : CNTR_NOT_SUPPORTED,
> > > - csv_sep);
> >
> > this hunk is not preserved in the new code.. I guess the output is
> > different for -A if counter wasn't meassure?
>
> The code for this is common in printout() now.
but what will be printed for -A not counted counters?
not the "CPU%*d%s%*s%s" ...
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists