linux-kernel - Re: mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: add support for ls1021a

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AM2PR04MB0722FEFEBDF36AA91450D33189C60@AM2PR04MB0722.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Sun, 24 Jan 2016 04:16:21 +0000
From:	Yao Yuan <yao.yuan@....com>
To:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	Han Xu <xhnjupt@...il.com>
CC:	Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@...escale.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	"han.xu@...escale.com" <han.xu@...escale.com>,
	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: add support for ls1021a

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 05:17 AM +0800, Brian Norris wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:30:55AM -0600, Han Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Yao Yuan <yao.yuan@....com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Han Xu < xhnjupt@...il.com > wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@...escale.com> wrote:
> >> > Any extra information you can find them on the patchwork:
> >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078931/
> >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078951/
> >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8079091/
> >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078941/
> >>
> >> Please send all patches in one patch set, this is not acceptable.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for your review.
> > But those patches are dts binding patch. And will send to  devicetree@...r.kernel.org and some corresponding maintainer.
> >
> > Those two patch sets will send to different mail-list and maintainers separately.
> >
> > So, maybe it's better to send the patch to the maintainer accordingly and thus I think can also reduce the workload of maintainer.
> >
> > How about your think?
>
> Send the complete patch set to maintainer and cc all related
> sub-module groups, so everybody could understand the whole story.

Agreed. You apparently did not read the suggested documentation from
last time:

  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt

Particularly, points 2 and 3.

Subsystem maintainers merge binding patches, so please send them as part
of the regular series.

OK, Got it.
Thanks Han Xu and  Brian Norris.

I will resend them as a complete patch set.