linux-kernel - Re: 'perf stat --repeat N' oddity/regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:48:38 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: 'perf stat --repeat N' oddity/regression

Em Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:43:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 07:35:11PM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > 
> > So it appears it broke somewhere between v4.0 and v4.1, as the v4.0 install 
> > displays:
> > 
> >     16,244,802,268      instructions               ( +- 23.01% )
> > 
> >        2.108676769 seconds time elapsed                                          ( +-  0.86% )
> > 
> > 
> > [a few minutes later]
> > 
> > Bisected it down to:
> 
> Mel Gorman reported this and Jiri provided a patch that Mel tested and
> verified that it fixed, checking where it is sitting now...

I already sent it your way, its:

    198 N C 01/21 Arnaldo Carvalh (1.4K) ├─>[PATCH 06/16] perf stat: Do not clean event's private stats

Please pull my perf-core-for-mingo tag and you should get it, its an one
liner.

- Arnaldo
 
> - Arnaldo
>  
> >  106a94a0f8c207ef4113ce7e32f34a00b3b174e7 is the first bad commit
> >  commit 106a94a0f8c207ef4113ce7e32f34a00b3b174e7
> >  Author: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> >  Date:   Fri Jun 26 11:29:19 2015 +0200
> > 
> >      perf stat: Introduce read_counters function
> > 
> > So this look like to be a regression.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > 	Ingo