[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160126080822.GA7970@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:08:22 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: 'perf stat --repeat N' oddity/regression
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> Em Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:43:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 07:35:11PM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > >
> > > So it appears it broke somewhere between v4.0 and v4.1, as the v4.0 install
> > > displays:
> > >
> > > 16,244,802,268 instructions ( +- 23.01% )
> > >
> > > 2.108676769 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.86% )
> > >
> > >
> > > [a few minutes later]
> > >
> > > Bisected it down to:
> >
> > Mel Gorman reported this and Jiri provided a patch that Mel tested and
> > verified that it fixed, checking where it is sitting now...
>
> I already sent it your way, its:
>
> 198 N C 01/21 Arnaldo Carvalh (1.4K) ├─>[PATCH 06/16] perf stat: Do not clean event's private stats
>
> Please pull my perf-core-for-mingo tag and you should get it, its an one
> liner.
Hm, are all of those changes fixes? If not then mind splitting them into a
perf/urgent portion as well?
Thanks!
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists