linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual topology

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:01:41 +0200
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...il.com>,
	Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] dmaengine: dw: rename masters to reflect actual
 topology

On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 12:24 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:35:02AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 22:36 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > This is patch 3 of a series but I don't have anything else in the
> > > series.  What is going on with the rest of the series - what are
> > > the
> > > dependencies and so on?
> 
> > Mark, sorry about that, but in this particular case you may
> > consider
> > this patch is a standalone one. You are in the Cc list due to SPI
> > driver small change. This change isn't modifying functionality of
> > the
> > driver.
> 
> And there's no dependency relationship with the rest of the series?

Yes, in this particular case. To confirm I even rebased locally the
series to be 100% sure.

The complete series can be found in
https://bitbucket.org/mansr/linux-dwc/branch/dwc-sata

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy