[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160125150046.GB7794@danjae.kornet>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 00:00:46 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/26] perf tools: Introduce struct perf_hpp_list
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:24:12AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Gather output and sort lists under struct perf_hpp_list,
> so we could have multiple instancies of sort/output format
> entries.
>
> Replacing current perf_hpp__list and perf_hpp__sort_list
> lists with single perf_hpp_list instance.
>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-bdn1hamlwp2529thajbrh2w7@git.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/ui/hist.c | 11 ++++++-----
> tools/perf/util/hist.h | 16 ++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
> index 2cd1a03bf375..1253a62c422f 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
> @@ -436,9 +436,10 @@ struct perf_hpp_fmt perf_hpp__format[] = {
> HPP__PRINT_FNS("Period", period, PERIOD)
> };
>
> -LIST_HEAD(perf_hpp__list);
> -LIST_HEAD(perf_hpp__sort_list);
> -
> +struct perf_hpp_list perf_hpp_list = {
> + .list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(perf_hpp_list.list),
> + .sort_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(perf_hpp_list.sort_list),
As the struct name already contains 'list', I don't think we need to
repeat it in the fields.
> +};
>
> #undef HPP__COLOR_PRINT_FNS
> #undef HPP__COLOR_ACC_PRINT_FNS
> @@ -506,7 +507,7 @@ void perf_hpp__init(void)
>
> void perf_hpp__column_register(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
> {
> - list_add_tail(&format->list, &perf_hpp__list);
> + list_add_tail(&format->list, &perf_hpp_list.list);
> }
>
> void perf_hpp__column_unregister(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
> @@ -516,7 +517,7 @@ void perf_hpp__column_unregister(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
>
> void perf_hpp__register_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
> {
> - list_add_tail(&format->sort_list, &perf_hpp__sort_list);
> + list_add_tail(&format->sort_list, &perf_hpp_list.sort_list);
> }
>
> void perf_hpp__cancel_cumulate(void)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.h b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
> index f3bcf2d38733..a9c8ccfcc284 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/hist.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
> @@ -226,20 +226,24 @@ struct perf_hpp_fmt {
> int idx;
> };
>
> -extern struct list_head perf_hpp__list;
> -extern struct list_head perf_hpp__sort_list;
> +struct perf_hpp_list {
> + struct list_head list;
> + struct list_head sort_list;
> +};
What about this?
struct perf_hpp_list {
struct list_head fields;
struct list_head sorts;
};
This also aligns with the option names.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> +
> +extern struct perf_hpp_list perf_hpp_list;
>
> #define perf_hpp__for_each_format(format) \
> - list_for_each_entry(format, &perf_hpp__list, list)
> + list_for_each_entry(format, &perf_hpp_list.list, list)
>
> #define perf_hpp__for_each_format_safe(format, tmp) \
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(format, tmp, &perf_hpp__list, list)
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(format, tmp, &perf_hpp_list.list, list)
>
> #define perf_hpp__for_each_sort_list(format) \
> - list_for_each_entry(format, &perf_hpp__sort_list, sort_list)
> + list_for_each_entry(format, &perf_hpp_list.sort_list, sort_list)
>
> #define perf_hpp__for_each_sort_list_safe(format, tmp) \
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(format, tmp, &perf_hpp__sort_list, sort_list)
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(format, tmp, &perf_hpp_list.sort_list, sort_list)
>
> extern struct perf_hpp_fmt perf_hpp__format[];
>
> --
> 2.4.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists