[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160125143743.GA10064@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:37:43 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/26] perf tools: Introduce hists specific format entries
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:24:24PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 08:15:52AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:23:58AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > hi,
> > > currently we have global format sort and output
> > > lists. This rfc patchset introduces hists object
> > > based format entries to allow the hist object to
> > > carry specific format entries.
> > >
> > > This will allow to have distinguished hist objects
> > > displaying different stuff in output.
>
> The concepth is OK. But I don't want to embed hists into the
> hist_entry for hierarchy mode. As you said it'd be better to factor
> out common bits and embed it both from hists and hist entry. In the
> minimal, two rbroot (for in and out) and a format list would be
> required IMHO.
right.. however this patchset just adds the support to have
format lists (sort and output) defined for the hists object
I plan the 'cutting out common hists' part to come after this
one and after we merge your hierachy view patchset
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists