linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Add STM32 pinctrl/GPIO driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56A92FB0.7080907@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jan 2016 21:59:28 +0100
From:	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@...com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
	Bruno Herrera <bruherrera@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Add STM32 pinctrl/GPIO driver

On 01/27/2016 02:20 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Maxime Coquelin
> <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>  wrote:
>
>> >This is the fourth round of STM32 pinctrl series, which takes into
>> >account comments made by Patrice on patch 4.
> I have applied patch 2 and 4 to the pinctrl tree.

Just tried to compile your devel branch, and it breaks:

   CC      drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32f429.o
drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c: In function 
'stm32_gpiolib_register_bank':
drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c:692:17: error: 'struct gpio_chip' 
has no member named 'dev'
   bank->gpio_chip.dev = dev;
                  ^
make[3]: *** [drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.o] Error 1

This is due to the field renaming you did in gpio_chip struct:
58383c7 gpio: change member .dev to .parent

How do you prefer to proceed?
Should I send a fix on top of your devel branch, or you will fix it 
directly?

Thanks,
Maxime