[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A8F7AB.7090500@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 18:00:27 +0100
From: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@...com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Bruno Herrera <bruherrera@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Add STM32 pinctrl/GPIO driver
Hi Linus,
On 01/27/2016 02:20 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Maxime Coquelin
> <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> This is the fourth round of STM32 pinctrl series, which takes into
>> account comments made by Patrice on patch 4.
>
> I have applied patch 2 and 4 to the pinctrl tree.
Thanks a lot!
>
> Please put the rest of the patches in through ARM SoC, you can
> add my
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> to them.
>
> AFAICT there is no compile-time dependency between these two
> patches and the rest, so it should merge just fine.
Indeed, I confirm.
Regards,
Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists