linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] drm/dsi: Add routine to unregister dsi device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Jan 2016 10:50:14 +0530
From:	Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>
To:	Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Cc:	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, a.hajda@...sung.com,
	jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch, l.stach@...gutronix.de,
	robh@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] drm/dsi: Add routine to unregister dsi device



On 01/21/2016 09:42 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 06:11:39PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
>> A driver calling mipi_dsi_device_new might want to unregister the device
>> once it's done. It might also require it in an error handling path in
>> case something didn't go right.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h | 5 +++++
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>> index cb084af..410d8b5 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>> @@ -195,6 +195,11 @@ ssize_t mipi_dsi_generic_read(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi, const void *params,
>>
>>   struct mipi_dsi_device *mipi_dsi_device_new(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>>   					    struct mipi_dsi_device_info *info);
>> +static inline void mipi_dsi_device_unregister(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
>> +{
>> +	device_unregister(&dsi->dev);
>> +}
>
> This is the same, essentially, as mipi_dsi_remove_device_fn(). I think
> this should move into drm_mipi_dsi.c and mipi_dsi_remove_device_fn()
> should call this new function so that both OF and !OF share the same
> code for this.

I can do this.

Thanks,
Archit


-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation