lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A85C52.6040607@nvidia.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:27:38 +0530
From:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] rtc: max77686: Use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of current
 array length


On Wednesday 27 January 2016 09:06 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> It is better to use the ARRAY_SIZE() macro instead of the array length
> to avoid bugs if the array is later changed and the length not updated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
>

Acked-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ