linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160127060923.GB28238@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:39:23 +0530
From:	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Cc:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	"Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the
 policy list

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:18:24AM +0000, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 25/01/16 15:20, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 25-01-16, 15:16, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> > > Currently next_policy() explicitly checks if a policy is the last
> > > policy in the cpufreq_policy_list. Use the standard list_is_last
> > > primitive instead.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 +++---
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > > index 78b1e2f..b3059a3 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > > @@ -67,11 +67,11 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *next_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > >  {
> > >  	lockdep_assert_held(&cpufreq_driver_lock);
> 
> Which branch is this patch based on?

My bad! This is based on your branch  git://linux-arm.org/linux-jl.git
upstream/cpufreq_cleanups. I found this issue while reviewing your
cleanup patches.


> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - Juri

--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.