[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1453876346-21869-1-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 12:02:26 +0530
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Juri Lelli <Lelli" <juri.lelli@....com>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list
Currently next_policy() explicitly checks if a policy is the last
policy in the cpufreq_policy_list. Use the standard list_is_last
primitive instead.
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
The earlier version one was based on an Juri's experimental branch.
I have based this one on linux-pm.git linux-next branch.
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index c35e7da..e979ec7 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -48,11 +48,11 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *next_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
bool active)
{
do {
- policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list);
-
/* No more policies in the list */
- if (&policy->policy_list == &cpufreq_policy_list)
+ if (list_is_last(&policy->policy_list, &cpufreq_policy_list))
return NULL;
+
+ policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list);
} while (!suitable_policy(policy, active));
return policy;
--
1.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists