lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 27 Jan 2016 13:40:24 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the aio tree

Hi Benjamin,

On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:38:35 -0500 Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:40:34PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > After merging the aio tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > fs/built-in.o: In function `aio_thread_op_foo_at':
> > file.c:(.text+0x43808): undefined reference to `__get_user_bad'
> > file.c:(.text+0x43838): undefined reference to `__get_user_bad'  
> 
> This is very strange.  It seems to imply that __get_user() doesn't 
> handle 64 bit values, which is completely broken behaviour on the 
> architecture's part if true.  Can any ARM folks comment on the right 
> fix here?

Well, probably only if you cc them :-)

Indeed, __get_user on arm does not handle 64 bit objects, where as
get_user does ...

Background: new aio code is adding __get_user() calls referencing 64
bit quantities (__u64 and __s64).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ