linux-kernel - computing drop-able caches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Jan 2016 15:42:53 -0800
From:	Daniel Walker <danielwa@...co.com>
To:	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, "Khalid Mughal (khalidm)" <khalidm@...co.com>,
	"xe-kernel@...ernal.cisco.com" <xe-kernel@...ernal.cisco.com>
Subject: computing drop-able caches

Hi,

My colleague Khalid and I are working on a patch which will provide a 
/proc file to output the size of the drop-able page cache.
One way to implement this is to use the current drop_caches /proc 
routine, but instead of actually droping the caches just add
up the amount.

Here's a quote Khalid,

"Currently there is no way to figure out the droppable pagecache size
from the meminfo output. The MemFree size can shrink during normal
system operation, when some of the memory pages get cached and is
reflected in "Cached" field. Similarly for file operations some of
the buffer memory gets cached and it is reflected in "Buffers" field.
The kernel automatically reclaims all this cached & buffered memory,
when it is needed elsewhere on the system. The only way to manually
reclaim this memory is by writing 1 to /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches. "

So my impression is that the drop-able cache is spread over two fields 
in meminfo.

Alright, the question is does this info live someplace else that we 
don't know about? Or someplace in the kernel where it could be
added to meminfo trivially ?

The point of the whole exercise is to get a better idea of free memory 
for our employer. Does it make sense to do this for computing free memory?

Any comments welcome..

Daniel