[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A98CD6.1000900@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 11:36:54 +0800
From: Xunlei Pang <xpang@...hat.com>
To: Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, 0x7f454c46@...il.com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
dyoung@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: unmap reserved pages for each error-return way
On 2016/01/27 at 19:48, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> For allocation of kimage failure or kexec_prepare or load segments
> errors there is no need to keep crashkernel memory mapped.
> It will affect only s390 as map/unmap hook defined only for it.
> As on unmap s390 also changes os_info structure let's check return code
> and add info only on success.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
> include/linux/kexec.h | 2 +-
> kernel/kexec.c | 4 ++--
> kernel/kexec_core.c | 4 ++--
> 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> index 2f1b721..60bf374 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static int machine_kdump_pm_cb(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
> case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
> case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
> if (crashk_res.start)
> - crash_unmap_reserved_pages();
> + crash_unmap_reserved_pages(0);
> break;
> default:
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> @@ -147,39 +147,34 @@ static int kdump_csum_valid(struct kimage *image)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Map or unmap crashkernel memory
> + * Map crashkernel memory
> */
> -static void crash_map_pages(int enable)
> +void crash_map_reserved_pages(void)
> {
> unsigned long size = resource_size(&crashk_res);
>
> BUG_ON(crashk_res.start % KEXEC_CRASH_MEM_ALIGN ||
> size % KEXEC_CRASH_MEM_ALIGN);
> - if (enable)
> - vmem_add_mapping(crashk_res.start, size);
> - else {
> - vmem_remove_mapping(crashk_res.start, size);
> - if (size)
> - os_info_crashkernel_add(crashk_res.start, size);
> - else
> - os_info_crashkernel_add(0, 0);
> - }
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Map crashkernel memory
> - */
> -void crash_map_reserved_pages(void)
> -{
> - crash_map_pages(1);
> + vmem_add_mapping(crashk_res.start, size);
> }
>
> /*
> * Unmap crashkernel memory
> */
> -void crash_unmap_reserved_pages(void)
> +void crash_unmap_reserved_pages(int error)
> {
> - crash_map_pages(0);
> + unsigned long size = resource_size(&crashk_res);
> +
> + BUG_ON(crashk_res.start % KEXEC_CRASH_MEM_ALIGN ||
> + size % KEXEC_CRASH_MEM_ALIGN);
> + vmem_remove_mapping(crashk_res.start, size);
> +
> + if (error)
> + return;
> + if (size)
> + os_info_crashkernel_add(crashk_res.start, size);
> + else
> + os_info_crashkernel_add(0, 0);
> }
I think it doesn't hurt doing os_info_crashkernel_add() multiple times which will make
the code cleaner.
>
> /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
> index 2cc643c..ef3bd1e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ int kexec_should_crash(struct task_struct *);
> void crash_save_cpu(struct pt_regs *regs, int cpu);
> void crash_save_vmcoreinfo(void);
> void crash_map_reserved_pages(void);
> -void crash_unmap_reserved_pages(void);
> +void crash_unmap_reserved_pages(int error);
> void arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo(void);
> __printf(1, 2)
> void vmcoreinfo_append_str(const char *fmt, ...);
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec.c b/kernel/kexec.c
> index ee70aef..dfc6c18 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec.c
> @@ -204,13 +204,13 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(kexec_load, unsigned long, entry, unsigned long, nr_segments,
> goto out;
> }
> kimage_terminate(image);
> - if (flags & KEXEC_ON_CRASH)
> - crash_unmap_reserved_pages();
> }
> /* Install the new kernel, and Uninstall the old */
> image = xchg(dest_image, image);
>
> out:
> + if ((flags & KEXEC_ON_CRASH) && (nr_segments > 0))
> + crash_unmap_reserved_pages(result);
> mutex_unlock(&kexec_mutex);
> kimage_free(image);
Shouldn't we do the similar thing for kexec_file_load()?
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_core.c b/kernel/kexec_core.c
> index 8dc6591..cae5d11 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_core.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_core.c
> @@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ int crash_shrink_memory(unsigned long new_size)
> crashk_res.end = end - 1;
>
> insert_resource(&iomem_resource, ram_res);
> - crash_unmap_reserved_pages();
> + crash_unmap_reserved_pages(0);
If using arch_kexec_unprotect/protect_crashkres(), we don't need this since there's a judge at the entry :-)
if (kexec_crash_image) {
ret = -ENOENT;
goto unlock;
}
Regards,
Xunlei
>
> unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&kexec_mutex);
> @@ -1555,5 +1555,5 @@ int kernel_kexec(void)
> void __weak crash_map_reserved_pages(void)
> {}
>
> -void __weak crash_unmap_reserved_pages(void)
> +void __weak crash_unmap_reserved_pages(int error)
> {}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists