[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQ_8o0FiRpb7D6RBmA+7WxRMFhWJjo2f4E_NH5qAGYb4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:22:35 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: guard sub-directory with CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK
Hi Linus
2016-01-27 23:11 GMT+09:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Masahiro Yamada
> <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>
>> CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK is more suitable than CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK
>> to guard the drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/ directory.
>> (I renamed CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON to CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK.)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
>
> This patch does not apply to linux v4.5-rc1, please rebase the
> patch and resend.
These two patches can be applied in this order:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8097541/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8097551/
(Sorry, I should have sent them as a series.)
If you want to apply only the latter onto v4.5-rc1,
"git am -C2" can apply it.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists