lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaA37GXf8c=EznSpocLp33CaU8dYqb8V0pua4dVfZa_2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:29:13 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
	<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: guard sub-directory with CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> Hi Linus
>
> 2016-01-27 23:11 GMT+09:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>:
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Masahiro Yamada
>> <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>>
>>> CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK is more suitable than CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK
>>> to guard the drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/ directory.
>>> (I renamed CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON to CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK.)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
>>
>> This patch does not apply to linux v4.5-rc1, please rebase the
>> patch and resend.
>
>
> These two patches can be applied in this order:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8097541/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8097551/
>
> (Sorry, I should have sent them as a series.)

No order works for me and I have merged quite a lot of other stuff
that had higher priority.

But please rebase both patches on my "devel" branch and resend
and I will apply them.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ