linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: guard sub-directory with CONFIG_PINCTRL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNATxUjsEtVmD3i4ZByC3kjnOk7gMf29hOn7ZfQa2MB9Gqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:56:45 +0900
From:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
	<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: guard sub-directory with CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK

Hi Linus,


2016-02-10 18:29 GMT+09:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Masahiro Yamada
> <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>> Hi Linus
>>
>> 2016-01-27 23:11 GMT+09:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>:
>>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Masahiro Yamada
>>> <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK is more suitable than CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK
>>>> to guard the drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/ directory.
>>>> (I renamed CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON to CONFIG_PINCTRL_MTK.)
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
>>>
>>> This patch does not apply to linux v4.5-rc1, please rebase the
>>> patch and resend.
>>
>>
>> These two patches can be applied in this order:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8097541/
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8097551/
>>
>> (Sorry, I should have sent them as a series.)
>
> No order works for me and I have merged quite a lot of other stuff
> that had higher priority.
>
> But please rebase both patches on my "devel" branch and resend
> and I will apply them.
>

Sure.

The first one is already in your devel branch.

I've rebased and posted the second one.




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada