linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7][RFC] regmap: add regmap_raw_update_bits() and merge all regmap_update_bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160210093817.GR13270@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 10 Feb 2016 09:38:17 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7][RFC] regmap: add regmap_raw_update_bits() and merge
 all regmap_update_bits_xxx()

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 02:44:11AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:

> Current regmap has many similar update functions, but the difference is
> very few. This patch adds new regmap_raw_update_bits() and merge all
> update functions into it by macro.

This is a bit hard to review due to the way the diff comes out, it's not
entirely clear what the code comes out looking like and I'm a bit
nervous about what the gains might be since macro conversions often
obscure things (this is making the macros undocumented for example).
Creating the new function and then using it in a separate patch would be
better.

> +int regmap_raw_update_bits(struct regmap *map, unsigned int reg,
> +			   unsigned int mask, unsigned int val,
> +			   bool *change, bool async, bool force)

_raw specifically means something that works with the direct physical
data format within regmap, a different name would be better.

> -	map->async = true;
> +	map->async = async ? true : false;

This is abuse of the ternery operator where a normal if statement would
do, and it's also rewriting a bool into a bool so a simple assignment is
enough.

>  /**
> - * regmap_update_bits_check_async: Perform a read/modify/write cycle on the
> - *                                 register map asynchronously and report if
> - *                                 updated
> + * regmap_write_bits: Perform a read/modify/write cycle on the register map

This looks like it renames update_bits() to write_bits()...

> +#define regmap_update_bits(map, reg, mask, val) \
> +	regmap_raw_update_bits(map, reg, mask, val, NULL, false, false)
> +#define regmap_update_bits_async(map, reg, mask, val)\
> +	regmap_raw_update_bits(map, reg, mask, val, NULL, true, false)
> +#define regmap_update_bits_check(map, reg, mask, val, change)\
> +	regmap_raw_update_bits(map, reg, mask, val, change, false, false)
> +#define regmap_update_bits_check_async(map, reg, mask, val, change)\
> +	regmap_raw_update_bits(map, reg, mask, val, change, true, false)
> +

...but we don't seem to use it?  The new name is also a bit confusing.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)