[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1453944439-1070-1-git-send-email-stefan@agner.ch>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 17:27:19 -0800
From: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To: linux@....linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: don't print missing L2 cache as error
Not having a L2 cache controller is a shame, but not an error. Avoid
printing an error message if L2 controller initialization returns
with ENODEV.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
---
Hi Russel,
We use a multiplatform kernel for two similar SoC's, one with L2
cache the other without. Maybe silently ignore -ENODEV would be
an option too, not sure what is preferred here.
--
Stefan
arch/arm/kernel/irq.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c b/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
index 1d45320e..f80c480 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
@@ -95,7 +95,9 @@ void __init init_IRQ(void)
outer_cache.write_sec = machine_desc->l2c_write_sec;
ret = l2x0_of_init(machine_desc->l2c_aux_val,
machine_desc->l2c_aux_mask);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret == -ENODEV)
+ pr_info("L2C: no device found\n");
+ else if (ret)
pr_err("L2C: failed to init: %d\n", ret);
}
--
2.7.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists