lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160129135712.GA7201@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:57:12 +0000
From:	Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
To:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc:	Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, mohan_srinivasan@...oo.com,
	dm-devel@...hat.com, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.com>,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: reinstate dm target local ioctl support

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 01:50:19PM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> However this also removed the possibility of a dm target having target
> specific ioctls.  Currently this is not used by any in-tree targets but
> was utilised by the flashcache out-of-tree module.
 
What data is being passed in and out?

The method we support is passing it through DM_TARGET_MSG (as text).
For examples look at dm-switch.c and dm-stats.c, which handled
pretty large quantities of data.

Would that work?

Alasdair

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ