[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160129143558.GR9864@bark>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:35:58 +0000
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
To: Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, mohan_srinivasan@...oo.com,
dm-devel@...hat.com, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.com>,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: reinstate dm target local ioctl support
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 01:57:12PM +0000, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 01:50:19PM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > However this also removed the possibility of a dm target having target
> > specific ioctls. Currently this is not used by any in-tree targets but
> > was utilised by the flashcache out-of-tree module.
>
> What data is being passed in and out?
>
> The method we support is passing it through DM_TARGET_MSG (as text).
> For examples look at dm-switch.c and dm-stats.c, which handled
> pretty large quantities of data.
>
> Would that work?
That sounds like it has all the bits one would need indeed. I will
investigate that. Thanks for the info.
-apw
Powered by blists - more mailing lists