[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56ACD39A.1040003@metafoo.de>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 16:15:38 +0100
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pmeerw@...erw.net,
Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging:iio:adc:added space around '-'
On 01/30/2016 04:12 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We could make checkpatch.pl not complain if the line says checkpatch: on
> it. It would look like this.
>
> - in_voltage-voltage_thresh_low_value,
> + in_voltage-voltage_thresh_low_value, /* checkpatch: not math */
>
> I suppose I could have made the explanation longer since the it won't
> complain about the 80 character limit... What do you guys think?
We could add it as a temporary way to silence the checker. But it feels a
bit ugly, there is really no reason why this shouldn't be a string, other
than that the current device attr macros don't support that.
- Lars
Powered by blists - more mailing lists