[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1454173334.7329.14.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 09:02:14 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pmeerw@...erw.net, Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging:iio:adc:added space around '-'
On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 18:12 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We could make checkpatch.pl not complain if the line says checkpatch:
> on
> it. It would look like this.
>
> - in_voltage-voltage_thresh_low_value,
> + in_voltage-voltage_thresh_low_value, /* checkpatch:
> not math */
>
> I suppose I could have made the explanation longer since the it won't
> complain about the 80 character limit... What do yo/u guys think?
Maybe use a more generic thing like the checkpatch type
in_voltage-voltage_thresh_low_value, /* checkpatch-SPACING */
Even so, it might uglify checkpatch code a lot to
check something like this per-line or per-block.
And that likely would have to be per line in the
code as checkpatch couldn't see when a patch block
addition occurs outside the scope of a comment.
I suppose inside checkpatch the "sub report {"
function could be extended to look at the specific
$rawline being tested for any "checkpatch" comment
and if so, test if it's the specific $type.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists