lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871t8wa9o2.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
Date:	Mon, 01 Feb 2016 13:37:33 +0100
From:	Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To:	Mathieu OTHACEHE <m.othacehe@...il.com>
Cc:	johan@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] USB: serial: mos7840: move constants to right

Mathieu OTHACEHE <m.othacehe@...il.com> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:33:54PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
>> I feel I'm missing something here, so I have to ask the stupid question:
>> What could possibly be the benefit here?  Is it faster? Safer?  Easier
>> to read?
>
> I don't think it will be faster or safer, maybe easier to read. But the point is to remove the
> warnings produced by the file scripts/coccinelle/misc/compare_const_fl.cocci when
> running make coccicheck.

Making a tool happy is never going to be a valid reason for anything.
If it were, then you would not be necessary...

Luckily you still are. Your task is adding some intelligence to the
output of the script.  That means that you should look at the output and
describe how it improves the code in a way that makes me understand it.
And I can be pretty slow :)

If you can't do that, then there is a high probability that the script
didn't improve anything.


Bjørn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ