linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V13 09/10] vfio, platform: add support for ACPI while detecting the reset driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56AF8B6A.8040504@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Mon, 1 Feb 2016 11:44:26 -0500
From:	Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To:	Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	marc.zyngier@....com, mark.rutland@....com, timur@...eaurora.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, cov@...eaurora.org,
	vinod.koul@...el.com, jcm@...hat.com
Cc:	shankerd@...eaurora.org, vikrams@...eaurora.org,
	agross@...eaurora.org, arnd@...db.de,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Baptiste Reynal <b.reynal@...tualopensystems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V13 09/10] vfio, platform: add support for ACPI while
 detecting the reset driver

On 2/1/2016 11:29 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
>> hanks, we should ask Baptiste to get his email into the Maintainer file list.
> I think it is:
> ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl
> 0001-vfio-platform-add-support-for-ACPI-while-detecting-t.patch
> 
> Baptiste Reynal <b.reynal@...tualopensystems.com> (maintainer:VFIO
> PLATFORM DRIVER,commit_signer:1/5=20%)
> Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com> (maintainer:VFIO
> DRIVER,commit_signer:2/3=67%,commit_signer:4/5=80%)
> ../..

Strange, I'll reset my tree. 

>> > 
>>> >>
>>> >> On my side I tested with of amd xgbe and I don't observe any regression.
>>> >>
>>> >> Best Regards
>> > 
>> > Can I add your tested by?
> Well to make things clear I did not test the ACPI part. I just can tell
> this does not bring any regression on the of part. But I am not against
> if you don't find anybody else and you tested the ACPI part ;-)
> 

How about?

of-tested-by: ...

Shanker and I tested ACPI before pushing the patches to the list and we also 
posted the corresponding QEMU patches as well to the qemu-devel maillist.

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/575878/

I'll ask him to add his acpi-tested-by for the ACPI part.

> Best Regards


-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project